{"id":16937,"date":"2022-11-15T14:29:40","date_gmt":"2022-11-15T14:29:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hedman.legal\/?post_type=articles_posttype&#038;p=16937"},"modified":"2024-02-22T20:30:31","modified_gmt":"2024-02-22T20:30:31","slug":"3-naidet-kuidas-originaalsus-tagas-autorioiguse","status":"publish","type":"articles_posttype","link":"https:\/\/hedman.legal\/et\/artiklid\/3-naidet-kuidas-originaalsus-tagas-autorioiguse\/","title":{"rendered":"3 n\u00e4idet, kuidas originaalsus tagas autori\u00f5iguse"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_76 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Sisukord<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/hedman.legal\/et\/artiklid\/3-naidet-kuidas-originaalsus-tagas-autorioiguse\/#Originaalselt_souad_autorioigust_kaitstes_kaugele_jouad\" >Originaalselt s\u00f5uad, autori\u00f5igust kaitstes kaugele j\u00f5uad<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/hedman.legal\/et\/artiklid\/3-naidet-kuidas-originaalsus-tagas-autorioiguse\/#Ka_disainilahendustele_on_ainus_noue_originaalsus\" >Ka disainilahendustele on ainus n\u00f5ue originaalsus<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/hedman.legal\/et\/artiklid\/3-naidet-kuidas-originaalsus-tagas-autorioiguse\/#Tehnilised_piirangud_loomingus_ei_valista_autorioiguslikku_kaitset\" >Tehnilised piirangud loomingus ei v\u00e4lista autori\u00f5iguslikku kaitset<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n<p><strong>\u00dchendkuningriigi kohtute praktikas on seoses \u00fche <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bailii.org\/cgi-bin\/format.cgi?doc=\/ew\/cases\/EWHC\/IPEC\/2022\/2084.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">juhtum<\/a>iga \u00fcles kerkinud autori\u00f5iguslik k\u00fcsimus, millele \u00f5igusliku vastuse otsimisel p\u00f6\u00f6rduti ka Euroopa Liidu autori\u00f5iguse poole. Millised on p\u00f5hilised eeldused teose kaitsmiseks autori\u00f5igusega Euroopa Liidus?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-medium-font-size\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Originaalselt_souad_autorioigust_kaitstes_kaugele_jouad\"><\/span>Originaalselt s\u00f5uad, autori\u00f5igust kaitstes kaugele j\u00f5uad<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Aastatel 1985-1987 l\u00f5i USA endine professionaalne s\u00f5udja <strong>John Duke<\/strong> veetakistusega s\u00f5udeergomeetri <strong>WaterRower<\/strong>, mille patent on n\u00fc\u00fcdseks aegunud. <strong>\u00dchendkuningriigi <a href=\"https:\/\/hedman.legal\/et\/teenused\/intellektuaalomand\/\" target=\"_blank\" aria-label=\"intellektuaalomandi (opens in a new tab)\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" class=\"ek-link\">intellektuaalomandi<\/a> kaitse kohus <\/strong>arutas v\u00f5imalikust rikkumisest tulenevalt, kas WaterRower v\u00f5iks olla \u00dcK autori\u00f5iguse seadusega kaitstud kunstk\u00e4sit\u00f6\u00f6teos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kohtunik leidis, et v\u00f5ib k\u00fcll. WaterRoweris on koos nii piisaval m\u00e4\u00e4ral k\u00e4sit\u00f6\u00f6oskust kui ka kunstilist meisterlikkust. Lisaks m\u00e4rkis kohtunik, et v\u00e4ga t\u00f5en\u00e4oliselt loetaks WaterRower ka ELi \u00f5iguse kohaselt originaalseks teoseks. Sellise hinnangu andmisel toetus kohtunik Euroopa Liidu Kohtu praktika seisukohast olulisele asjaolule, et teose loomisel oli Duke\u2019il vaatamata tehnilistele piirangutele, mis kaasnevad s\u00f5udeergomeetri valmistamisega, siiski v\u00f5imalik v\u00e4ljendada oma vabu ja loomingulisi valikuid ning luua originaalne teos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"301\" height=\"264\" src=\"https:\/\/hedman.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/John-Duke-WaterRower-2.gif\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-16938\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">John Duke&#8217;i loodud WaterRower (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bailii.org\/cgi-bin\/format.cgi?doc=\/ew\/cases\/EWHC\/IPEC\/2022\/2084.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">allikas<\/a>).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>K\u00f5nealuse kiirotsusega vastas kohtunik v\u00e4idetava rikkuja taotlusele, millega viimane palus j\u00e4tta WaterRoweri hagi rahuldamata, ja l\u00fckkas \u00fcmber v\u00e4ite, et WaterRower ei saa mingil juhul olla autori\u00f5igusega kaitstav kunstk\u00e4sit\u00f6\u00f6teos (<em>work of artistic craftsmanship<\/em>). Seda, kas WaterRower t\u00f5esti on seaduse m\u00f5istes kunstk\u00e4sit\u00f6\u00f6teos, otsustab \u00dcK kohtunik.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"731\" height=\"475\" src=\"https:\/\/hedman.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/TOPIOM-rowing-machine-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-16940\" srcset=\"https:\/\/hedman.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/TOPIOM-rowing-machine-2.jpg 731w, https:\/\/hedman.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/TOPIOM-rowing-machine-2-300x195.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 731px) 100vw, 731px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">V\u00e4idetava autori\u00f5iguse rikkuja s\u00f5udeergomeeter TOPIOM (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.topiom.com\/product\/topiom-indoor-rowing-machine-for-sale\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">allikas<\/a>).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-medium-font-size\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ka_disainilahendustele_on_ainus_noue_originaalsus\"><\/span>Ka disainilahendustele on ainus n\u00f5ue originaalsus<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00dche viimaste aastate olulisema Euroopa Liidu Kohtu lahendina autori\u00f5iguse valdkonnas v\u00f5ib v\u00e4lja tuua <a href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/liste.jsf?nat=or&amp;mat=or&amp;pcs=Oor&amp;jur=C%2CT%2CF&amp;num=C-683%252F17&amp;for=&amp;jge=&amp;dates=&amp;language=et&amp;pro=&amp;cit=none%252CC%252CCJ%252CR%252C2008E%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252Ctrue%252Cfalse%252Cfalse&amp;oqp=&amp;td=%3BALL&amp;avg=&amp;lgrec=en&amp;lg=&amp;page=1&amp;cid=11302666\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cofemel<\/a>\u2019i r\u00f5ivadisaini lahendi. <strong>Portugali kohus<\/strong> leidis, et tarbekunstiteostele, t\u00f6\u00f6stusdisainilahendustele v\u00f5i disainiteostele laieneb autori\u00f5iguse kaitse tingimusel, et need on algup\u00e4rased, see t\u00e4hendab, et need on autori enda intellektuaalse loomingu tulemus, ilma et selleks oleks n\u00f5utav eriline esteetiline v\u00f5i kunstiline v\u00e4\u00e4rtus. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Seej\u00e4rel asus nimetatud kohus seisukohale, et k\u00e4esoleval juhul on asjaomased G\u2011Stari r\u00f5ivamudelid <strong>ARC<\/strong> ja <strong>ROWDY <\/strong>autori\u00f5igusega kaitstud teosed. L\u00f5puks leidis ta, et m\u00f5nede Cofemeli toodetud r\u00f5ivastega rikutakse G\u2011Stari autori\u00f5igusi. <strong>Euroopa Kohus <\/strong>selgitas, et disainilahenduste puhul tekib autori\u00f5iguslik kaitse \u00fcksnes originaalsuse n\u00f5ude t\u00e4itmisel ja mitte mingil muul alusel, nt subjektiivne ilutunnetus. ELi liikmesriigid ei saa anda autori\u00f5iguslikku kaitset disainilahendustele alusel, et neil on nt eriline esteetiline v\u00f5i kunstiline v\u00e4\u00e4rtus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"257\" height=\"191\" src=\"https:\/\/hedman.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/G-Star-Raw-CV-jeans-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-16942\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Vasakul G-Star Raw CV teksap\u00fcksid (originaalne teos) ja paremal Cofemeli teksad (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sgcr.pt\/index.php\/en\/resources\/news\/item\/202-copyright-for-utilitarian-designs-advocate-general-proposes-no-stricter-assessment-in-cofemel-case\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">allikas<\/a>).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-medium-font-size\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Tehnilised_piirangud_loomingus_ei_valista_autorioiguslikku_kaitset\"><\/span>Tehnilised piirangud loomingus ei v\u00e4lista autori\u00f5iguslikku kaitset<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Koosk\u00f5las <em>Cofemel<\/em>\u2019iga kinnitas Euroopa Kohus kohtuasjas <a href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/liste.jsf?nat=or&amp;mat=or&amp;pcs=Oor&amp;jur=C%2CT%2CF&amp;num=C-833%252F18&amp;for=&amp;jge=&amp;dates=&amp;language=et&amp;pro=&amp;cit=none%252CC%252CCJ%252CR%252C2008E%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252Ctrue%252Cfalse%252Cfalse&amp;oqp=&amp;td=%3BALL&amp;avg=&amp;lgrec=en&amp;lg=&amp;page=1&amp;cid=11302893\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Brompton Bicycle\u2019i ja Chedech\/Get2Get\u2019i vahel<\/a>, et toode on intellektuaalsest loomingust tulenev originaalne teos, kui autor on seda luues v\u00e4ljendanud oma loomingulist v\u00f5imet algup\u00e4raselt, tehes vabu ja loomingulisi valikuid, mille tulemusel peegeldab teos tema isikup\u00e4ra. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"274\" height=\"211\" src=\"https:\/\/hedman.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Brompton-Bicycle-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-16944\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Jalgratas Brompton (<a href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text=&amp;docid=223082&amp;pageIndex=0&amp;doclang=ET&amp;mode=lst&amp;dir=&amp;occ=first&amp;part=1&amp;cid=192708\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">allikas<\/a>).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Seega v\u00f5ivad jalgratas ja selle funktsionaalne kuju olla autori\u00f5igusliku kaitse all isegi siis, kui ratta spetsiifiline kuju on mingil m\u00e4\u00e4ral vajalik kindla tehnilise tulemuse saavutamiseks, tingimusel, et see vastab eespool nimetatud originaalse toote kriteeriumidele.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"301\" height=\"210\" src=\"https:\/\/hedman.legal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Chedech-Bicycle-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-16946\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Jalgratas Chedech (<a href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text=&amp;docid=223082&amp;pageIndex=0&amp;doclang=ET&amp;mode=lst&amp;dir=&amp;occ=first&amp;part=1&amp;cid=192708\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">allikas<\/a>).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>WaterRoweri ja sarnaste juhtumite puhul on autori vaatest ELi \u00f5iguse kohaldamise eeliseks just see, et autori\u00f5iguste tekkimiseks ongi vaja ainult originaalset teost ning hindama ei pea autori kavatsust v\u00f5i teose kunstilist v\u00e4\u00e4rtust.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":16951,"template":"","article_categories":[126],"class_list":["post-16937","articles_posttype","type-articles_posttype","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","article_categories-intellektuaalomand"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hedman.legal\/et\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles_posttype\/16937","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hedman.legal\/et\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles_posttype"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hedman.legal\/et\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/articles_posttype"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hedman.legal\/et\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16951"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hedman.legal\/et\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16937"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"article_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hedman.legal\/et\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article_categories?post=16937"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}